Oregon Climate Service, May 2004

Overview

May was a wet month, especially in eastern sections of Oregon (where the rains were really needed!). Maximum temperatures were generally below normal due to persistent cloud cover, while minimum temperatures were mostly above normal (for the same reason).


Table 1 is a summary of monthly averages and totals at selected stations throughout the state. Table 2 lists daily temperatures and precipitation for most of the locations listed in Table 1. In Table 3, monthly and seasonal precipitation totals throughout the state are listed. Figure 1 shows the percentage of seasonal precipitation statewide.

 

Basin Summary

Here is a summary of precipitation, water supply, and snow pack as of the end of the month, by river basin:

Precipitation
 Snow

Stream Flow

 SWSI
BASIN

(1)

(2)

 (3)

 (4)

 (5)

 (6)

(7)
OWYHEE 118 77 100 0 23 66 -1.0
MALHEUR 167 103 100 0 35 37 0.0
GRAND RONDE, POWDER, BURNT 190 111 103 81 84 81 -0.6
UMATILLA, WALLA WALLA, WILLOW 137 160 110 0 166 110 1.4
UPPER JOHN DAY 227 114 103 0 98 88 0.7
UPPER DESCHUTES, CROOKED 147 109 95 84 64 60 0.3
LOWER DESCHUTES, HOOD RIVER 116 100 90 60 83 74 -0.6
WILLAMETTE 100 93 93 75 81 84 0.0
ROGUE, UMPQUA 106 90 88 57 76 81 0.3
KLAMATH 137 100 84 11 48 65 -1.7
LAKE COUNTY, GOOSE LAKE 164 91 87 11 55 62 -0.2
HARNEY 140 84 103 55 63 73 -0.3
NORTH COAST 103 91 n.a n.a 65 79 -0.6
SOUTH COAST 61 98 n.a n.a. 51 87 -1.6

n.a. Not available
(1) Percent of normal May precipitation, from NOAA Cooperative sites
(2) Percent of normal seasonal precipitation (since Oct. 1), from NOAA Cooperative sites
(3) Percent of normal seasonal precipitation, from Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) SNOTEL sites
(4) Percent of normal snow water equivalent, from NRCS SNOTEL sites
(5) Percent of normal May stream flow, from U.S. Geological Survey (USGS)
(6) Percent of normal seasonal stream flow (since Oct. 1), from USGS
(7) Surface Water Supply Index, from NRCS (-4 = very dry, 0 = normal, +4 = very wet)

Forecasts

The Climate Prediction Center’s (CPC) forecasts for June-August appear below. Temperatures for all of Oregon are likely to be above normal. Precipitation probabilities suggest an increased chance ofbelow-normal precipitation. CPC also says:
“ A consolidation forecast of in-house tools indicates that Niño 3.4 SST anomalies will rise from its current near zero state to slightly above the +0.5C threshold [by the end of the year] and then decline slowly thereafter. The probability spread for cold - neutral - or warm ENSO conditions increases with the greatest likelihood shifting from near normal in summer to about equal chances for neutral or warm ENSO conditions by fall. There is little chance for a cold event to develop.” Translation: there might be a weak El Niño event later this year, but probably no La Niña.

“ Beginning next winter - the consensus is near the neutral/warm event border but then declines slowly. Since weak warm events do not exert strong forcing on the atmosphere... should one develop... we expect that transient atmospheric circulation patterns will continue to be forced primarily by intra-seasonally varying phases of the MJO... And the higher latitude patterns will be determined by varying phases of the AO and NAO that are not currently predictable at seasonal ranges.” Which means that we’re all clueless about what will happen next year!


Oregon Climate Service predicts near-normal temperatures and above-precipitation for June. For the three-month period June-August we predict normal temperatures and normal precipitation.

 

Severe Weather, June, 2004

It was quite a week.

In the span of three days, the mid-valley received more than a month's worth (for June, anyway) of rain. There was lightning and thunder, and some hail. And even several funnel clouds. The unsettled weather was spread throughout Oregon.

Barney Lerten of bend.com reported, “Central Oregon's stormiest spring in some time brought lightning that knocked out power to thousands of residents Wednesday afternoon, and also triggered a rare funnel cloud sighting in the Crooked River Ranch area - one of two tornadoes spotted in the state from the latest bout of unsettled weather.

“ A pilot reported the funnel cloud about 14 miles north of Redmond at 11:35 a.m., dissipating rapidly as it moved south at around 20 mph, the National Weather Service reported.” The bend.com web site shows a nice picture of the funnel cloud as it passed near Crooked River Ranch.

Meanwhile, 12 miles north of Eugene, a pilot and observers at the Eugene Airport spotted a funnel cloud, about 12 miles north of Eugene, the NWS reported. It showed little movement and also didn't touch ground before dissipating about two minutes later, observers said. And another funnel cloud was spotted crossing the Columbia River from Oregon into Washington.

The cause of all this? A “cold core low” that lingered over the Northwest for several days before moving eastward on Thursday. This is an upper-atmosphere phenomenon in which a low pressure storm, with very cold air near its center, moves over us. If air near the ground is fairly warm, there will be significant movement of air upward and downward: cold air sinks and warm air rises. And any time air moves vertically, significant (or even sever) weather can result. In winter, we get plenty of cold-core lows but the air near the ground is usually quite cool. In summer, we get warm air near the ground but usually don't see cold core lows. In late spring we can get both. Thus, May and June are the most common months for funnel clouds and tornadoes in Oregon.

And this is especially true when humidity is high, because moisture (in the form of water vapor) acts as “fuel” for storms. Following the rainy weather, there was plenty of moisture available to power the storms and bring wild weather.

Last year was very different. Warm, dry weather began in mid-May and persisted until October; we had heat waves but very little severe weather (except for a few mountain thunderstorms). But in other years, wet conditions in May and June helped trigger similarly “interesting” weather conditions.

The one I remember best was 1993. I was coaching my son John's baseball team that year and on three different occasions we had to end practice and hurry our players under shelter because of lightning strikes nearby. There were plenty of funnel clouds spotted.

And probably the strongest Oregon tornado ever reported occurred in the month of June (6/11/1968). A very strong thunderstorm formed over Wallowa County in extreme northeastern Oregon. The tornado spawned by this storm touched down in mountainous, forested areas which were mostly uninhabited. For that reason, there were virtually no eyewitnesses to this tornado, but its status as a tornado seems certain because of the sheer size of its path and the degree of destruction. A swath of destruction one half to two miles wide and 8 to 10 miles long was created by this storm, and destruction along the path was very significant. About 1800 acres of prime timber was destroyed and another 1200 acres were badly damaged. It was estimated that over 40 million board feet of lumber were blown down by the tornado. Hail stones that accompanied the tornado were reportedly of golf ball size in some cases. It was estimated that the tornado was an F2 on the Fujita scale (F0-F5).

Let's hope something like that never strikes populated areas, or we'll be in a heap of trouble!
George Taylor, June 2004

 

Plankton may influence climate change says UCSB scientist

(Santa Barbara, Calif.) -- Plankton appear to play a major role in regulating the global climate system, according to new research.


David Siegel, professor of geography at the University of California, Santa Barbara, and director of the Institute for Computational Earth System Science, made the discovery with his former Ph.D. student Dierdre Toole, who is now based at Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute.

In an article in the May 6 issue of the journal Geophysical Research Letters, the scientists explain their research in the Sargasso Sea, approximately 50 miles southeast of the island of Bermuda. Siegel's research group has been making observations at this location since 1992.

Phytoplankton are tiny, single-celled floating plants. They inhabit the upper layers of any natural body of water where there is enough light to support photosynthetic growth. They are the base of the ocean's food web, and their production helps to regulate the global carbon cycle. They also contribute to the global cycling of many other compounds with climate implications.

One of these compounds is a volatile organic sulfur gas called dimethyl sulfide or DMS. Scientists had previously theorized that DMS is part of a climate feedback mechanism, but until now there had been no observational evidence illustrating how reduced sunlight actually leads to the decreased ocean production of DMS. This is the breakthrough in Toole and Siegel's research.

They describe how the cycle begins when the ocean gives off DMS to the lower atmosphere. In the air, DMS breaks down into a variety of sulfur compounds that act as cloud-condensing nuclei, leading to increased cloudiness. With more clouds, less sunlight reaches the Earth and the biological processes which produce DMS are reduced.

According to their research, it appears that phytoplankton produce organic sulfur compounds as a chemical defense from the damaging effects of ultraviolet radiation and other environmental stresses, in much the same way as our bodies use vitamins E and C to flush out molecules that cause cellular damage.

Siegel and Toole found that ultraviolet radiation explained almost 90 percent of the variability in the biological production of DMS. They showed that summertime DMS production is "enormous," and that the entire upper layer of DMS content is replaced in just a few days. This demonstrates a tight link between DMS and solar fluxes.

" The significance of this work is that it provides, for the first time, observational evidence showing that the DMS-anti-oxidant mechanism closes the DMS-climate feedback loop," said Siegel. "The implications are huge. Now we know that phytoplankton respond dramatically to UV radiation stresses, and that this response is incredibly rapid, literally just days."

He explained that the findings give new impetus for scientists to re-examine the DMS-climate feedback hypothesis. And the DMS-climate feedback may also play out under possible global warming and climate change scenarios.

As the Earth's ozone shield thins and greenhouse gases increase, higher ultraviolet radiation will reach the surface layer of the oceans. The findings indicate that phytoplankton will then produce more DMS in response to this increased ultraviolet radiation, causing increasing cloudiness and mitigating the effects of global warming. However, Siegel is careful to note that while the process may mitigate global warming it will not reverse the trend.

The project was funded by NASA. NASA's Earth Science Enterprise is dedicated to understanding the Earth as an integrated system and applying Earth System Science to improve prediction of climate, weather, and natural hazards using the unique vantage point of space.


Oregon Climate Service

George H. Taylor, Oregon State Climatologist

Wayne P. Gibson, Programmer/GIS mngr.

Mandy Matzke, Research Assistant/Manager of Data Services

Melanie Mitchell, Undergraduate Assistant

Wolf Read, Undergraduate Assistant

Emily Gibson, Student Assistant

Cadee Hale, Publications Assistant

Kelsey Kuykendall, Undergraduate Assistant


Oregon Climate Service, Strand 326, Phone: (541) 737-5705 Oregon State University Fax: (541) 737-5710 Corvallis, Oregon 97331 E-mail: oregon@coas.orst.edu Web: http://www.ocs.oregonstate.edu