Oregon Climate Service, June 2004

Overview

June was a little on the warm side and a little on the dry side, in general. But dryland farmers in central and northeast Oregon rejoiced because of abundant rains, at a very opportune time. June rains often “make it or break it” for growers east of the Cascades, and after several years with dry periods at this time of year, the farmers and ranchers were especially grateful.


Table 1 is a summary of monthly averages and totals at selected stations throughout the state. Table 2 lists daily temperatures and precipitation for most of the locations listed in Table 1. In Table 3, monthly and seasonal precipitation totals throughout the state are listed. Figure 1 shows the percentage of seasonal precipitation statewide.

 

Basin Summary

Here is a summary of precipitation, water supply, and snow pack as of the end of the month, by river basin:

Precipitation

Stream Flow

 SWSI
BASIN

(1)

(2)

 (3)

 (4)

 (5)

(6)
OWYHEE 63 73 100 33 63 -1.2
MALHEUR 115 96 102 36 37 -0.3
GRAND RONDE, POWDER, BURNT 93 112 101 94 85 -1.1
UMATILLA, WALLA WALLA, WILLOW 125 110 108 164 114 1.4
UPPER JOHN DAY 64 109 100 106 90 0.2
UPPER DESCHUTES, CROOKED 141 110 95 47 58 0.0
LOWER DESCHUTES, HOOD RIVER 129 98 91 88 75 -0.8
WILLAMETTE 87 93 93 95 84 -0.3
ROGUE, UMPQUA 67 99 94 94 82 0.2
KLAMATH 74 97 92 48 63 -2.0
LAKE COUNTY, GOOSE LAKE 72 90 85 42 60 -0.5
HARNEY 58 81 102 79 74 -0.5
NORTH COAST 87 90 n.a 33 63 -0.8
SOUTH COAST 77 95 n.a 36 37 -2.1

n.a. Not available
(1) Percent of normal June precipitation, from NOAA Cooperative sites
(2) Percent of normal seasonal precipitation (since Oct. 1), from NOAA Cooperative sites
(3) Percent of normal seasonal precipitation, from Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) SNOTEL sites
(4) Percent of normal snow water equivalent, from NRCS SNOTEL sites
(5) Percent of normal June stream flow, from U.S. Geological Survey (USGS)
(6) Percent of normal seasonal stream flow (since Oct. 1), from USGS
(7) Surface Water Supply Index, from NRCS (-4 = very dry, 0 = normal, +4 = very wet)

Forecasts

The Climate Prediction Center’s (CPC) forecasts for July-September appear below. Temperatures for all of Oregon are likely to be above normal. Precipitation probabilities suggest an increased chance of below-normal precipitation. CPC also says:

“ Most climate models … indicate continuation of near-neutral tropical SSTs at least through the summer...after which the spread among model forecasts increases. The majority of models favor positive SST anomalies in the Niño 3.4 region by the upcoming cold season...but the magnitude of the anomalies are not enough to satisfy the criteria for an El Niño in many cases and even the models with the largest anomalies are not forecasting a strong El Niño.

“ The forecasts for July-Sept and Aug-Oct 2004 favor above normal temperatures over much of the west and southwest ... a region of abnormal dryness is likely during July-Sept over the Northwest U.S.from Washington and Oregon eastward and southeastward to include parts of the Great Basin and northern Rockies during July-Sept.”


Oregon Climate Service predicts near-normal temperatures and precipitation for July. For the three-month period July-September we predict normal temperatures and below-normal precipitation.

 

Drought in the West
May 30, 2004

Here in Oregon we’ve dodged a bullet the last several years. Unfortunately, some of our neighbors have been hit hard.

The last seven years have seen mostly drier than average conditions in the Western U.S., particularly the Southwest. The same climate shift that brought lots of rain, snow, and enhanced salmon runs to the Northwest has done just the opposite in Arizona, New Mexico, Utah, Wyoming, and parts of the remaining western states. According to a recent NASA press release (see reference below),

“ Drought has gripped some parts of the West for as many as seven consecutive years, causing one of the worst dry spells in decades. Soils are dry; reservoirs are low. Farmers and golf course managers are vying for irrigation water, residents face water rationing measures, and the politics of water "seniority" rights is heating up between cities and between states.”

My friend Roger Pielke, Sr., the Colorado State Climatologist, said this about drought:
“In modern times "there's more to drought than simple lack of precipitation," adds Roger Pielke Sr., a state climatologist for Colorado and a professor of atmospheric sciences at Colorado State University. "You have to consider human factors like the amount of water being drained from rivers for crop irrigation and drinking water. In absolute terms, the ongoing dry spell is not yet as severe as the Dust Bowl of the 1930s, but the impacts have been relatively severe because the demands that people place on the water supply are so much greater now than they were back then."

In the 30s, water supply recipients were primarily agriculture and domestic users. Nowadays, in addition to supporting many more users due to increasing population in the West, water suppliers have to worry about some additional types of demand:

1. Recreation. Reservoirs are very popular recreation sites, and the public demands full reservoirs for boating and other recreation pursuits. At the same time, rivers are popular for recreation, and there is demand to keep them flowing throughout the summer.
2. “In-stream” uses. Salmon and other aquatic species suffer when water levels are low. There is increasing pressure to keep rivers, streams and lakes full (and cool) to protect these species.
3. Industry. Water is an essential ingredient for most manufacturing processes.

One of the primary issues regarding water supply in the West involves the supply-demand process. In many areas, demands for water far exceed supply. Take Los Angeles, for example. This is a megalopolis in a semi-arid area whose water inputs (precipitation) are far smaller than the demands. Thus, Los Angeles has had to import water from other areas, some of them very far away. These include Northern California, the Colorado River and (in years past) Owens Valley and Mono Lake. But increasing demands in other states have led to some reallocations of water. One likely victim will be the farming community of Imperial Valley, one of California’s most productive agricultural areas. For decades, farmers there have relied on Colorado River water for irrigation. But that may change for many growers in the face of likely cutbacks in Imperial Valley water supplies later this year.

Fortunately, Oregon has received sufficient precipitation to enable most water users to have sufficient supply. While March and April were quite warm and dry and led to some water supply worries, May has had near-normal precipitation statewide, with well above-average in parts of eastern Oregon. For example, Pendleton has received 1.71 inches of rain through May 28, compared with a normal of 1.08. Several eastern Oregon locations have received more than 3 inches this month. And since many eastern Oregon farms practice “dryland farming,” particularly for wheat, rains in May are very welcome indeed!

Nonetheless, let me reiterate what I say to Oregonians every summer, whether we’re in a drought or not: water is and will continue to be a precious resource, Use it wisely, and conserve where possible. As my late mother was fond of saying: “Waste not, want not.”

NASA press release: http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2004/21may_drought.htm?list656723
Drought Monitor: http://www.drought.unl.edu/dm/monitor.html

Blue Moon

Blue Moon, you saw me standing alone
Without a dream in my heart
Without a love of my own.

“Blue Moon,” by Lorenz Hart and Richard Rodgers

“Blue Moons” don’t happen often, but we’re in for one this month. By definition, Blue Moon is the second full moon in a calendar month. Most months have only one full moon, but once in awhile (“once in a blue moon”) a second one occurs. Since the lunar cycle is 29 days, but most months have 30 or 31 days, so it is possible to have two full moons in a single month. This occurs on average once every two and a half years.

July has already had one full moon (July 2nd), so the next one, on July 31st, qualifies as a Blue Moon. Of course, the moon won’t really be BLUE. But from time to time the moon has taken on very different colors, even blue.
In 1883, for example, Krakatoa, a volcano in Indonesia, exploded violently. The sound was heard several thousand miles away. Ocean waves created by the blast were detected in the English Channel. And ash rose to the upper levels of the atmosphere. The moon turned blue.

Some of the ash particles were just the right size to scatter red light, while allowing other colors, such as blue and green, to pass through. White light from the moon emerged from the clouds as blue (and sometimes green). The blue moons lasted for years after the eruption. Some people reported lavender suns and "such vivid red sunsets that fire engines were called out in New York, Poughkeepsie, and New Haven to quench the apparent conflagration," according to vulcanologist Scott Rowland at the University of Hawaii. NASA’s web site has an interesting article describing this (that’s where I found Rowland’s quote):

http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2004/07jul_bluemoon.htm?list656723

Other volcanoes, though less significant than Krakatoa, have also turned the moon blue. This includes the 1980 eruption of nearby Mt. St. Helens. The 1991 Pinatubo eruption was the most recent, and you may remember the colorful sunrises and sunsets that lasted for many months.

A somewhat similar light scattering phenomenon occurs in association with severe storms in the Midwest and Eastern U.S. This is the legendary “green sky,” which causes great concern among many sky watchers – or, in some cases, excitement! Not every green sky portends severe weather, and not every sever storm is preceded by green sky, but the two happen often enough that folklore suggests “green skies precede tornadoes.” This phenomenon is rather mysterious, but many scientists believe that water vapor in the air causes enough light scattering to remove all but the green.

More common though, is red sky (as in “red sky in morning, sailor take warning”). This occurs most often near sunrise and sunset, as the sun shines at an angle though the atmosphere. At these times, the sun’s path is very long (think about looking almost horizontally through a swimming pool, versus looking straight down; in the latter case, you’re looking through much less water). Blue and green light are scattered more effectively by air molecules, and during their long transit of the atmosphere they are removed, leaving only the red. Thus, red sunrises and sunsets! And the same effect causes the moon to appear red when it’s near the horizon. So if you see the moon rise in the evening on July 31, you’ll be watching a “Red Blue Moon.”

Oregon Climate Service

George H. Taylor, Oregon State Climatologist

Wayne P. Gibson, Programmer/GIS mngr.

Mandy Matzke, Research Assistant/Manager of Data Services

Melanie Mitchell, Undergraduate Assistant

Wolf Read, Undergraduate Assistant

Emily Gibson, Student Assistant

Cadee Hale, Publications Assistant

Kelsey Kuykendall, Undergraduate Assistant

Sara Joos, Student Assistant


Oregon Climate Service, Strand 326, Phone: (541) 737-5705 Oregon State University Fax: (541) 737-5710 Corvallis, Oregon 97331 E-mail: oregon@coas.orst.edu Web: http://www.ocs.oregonstate.edu